CasesReport No. See also State v. Shaw, 154 Vt. 648, 577 A.2d 286, 287 (1990) (wherein the court employed a pragmatic balancing of three factors: (1) the degree of negligence or bad faith on the part of the government; (2) the importance of the evidence lost; and (3) other evidence of guilt adduced at trial). Prejudicial is used in this phrase to limit the introduction of probative evidence of prior misconduct only when it is unduly and unfairly prejudicial.' United States v. Platero, 72 F.3d 806, 814 (10th Cir.1995). The jury in this case is not privy to the information in the other cases, and this may lead to less emphasis on this aggravating factor. 844, 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985), is considered to be impartial even though it may be more conviction prone than a non-death-qualified jury. Dr. Raphael Franco, an electrical engineer, testified that he was contacted by an Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms agent to evaluate whether the fire was electrical in origin. The circuit court must consider evidence offered in mitigation, but it is not obliged to find that the evidence constitutes a mitigating circumstance. Calhoun v. State, 932 So.2d 923, 975 (Ala.Crim.App.2005). See Huddleston v. United States, 485 U.S. 681, 108 S.Ct. However, under Alabama's law the trial judge is required to accept this responsibility. In the case sub judice, identity was very much in question at the appellant's trial, as he denied setting fire to his estranged wife's house, because there were no witnesses who could place him at the house at the time the blaze began. The outlet receptacles were all in place, numerous photographs were taken of the outlets, one of Scott's experts testified that he had everything he needed to make a conclusion concerning the cause of the fire, and neither of Scott's experts testified that the fire originated in the area that housed the missing outlet. A fire starting within the television cabinet will produce the extremely high levels of [carbon monoxide] found in the blood of the victim., (R. Nothing about these words implies that the other acts' to which Rule 404(b) refers must be bad. Indeed, to read the Rule as such violate[s] the cardinal principle of statutory interpretation that courts must give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statute. Triestman v. United States, 124 F.3d 361, 375 (2d Cir.1997) (quoting United States v. Menasche, 348 U.S. 528, 53839, 75 S.Ct. Contra People v. Cooper, 53 Cal.3d 771, 281 Cal.Rptr. 2392, 2402, 49 L.Ed.2d 342. Thus, in Waldrop's case, the jury, and not the trial judge, determined the existence of the aggravating circumstance necessary for imposition of the death penalty. Ring [v. Arizona ], 536 U.S. [584,] 609, 122 S.Ct. So what that tells me is that all that is intact, it's uncompromised, and it's still working. WebView Scott Christie results in California (CA) including current phone number, address, relatives, background check report, and property record with Whitepages. Thornton said that firefighters sifted through the fire debris for 8 to 10 hours but were unable to locate this missing outlet. at 1764. 358.). William Crenshaw, a volunteer firefighter, testified that an older man hollered at Scott: What the hell have you done with my grandbabies? Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Crim.App.1984), aff'd in pertinent part, remanded on other part, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), aff'd on return to remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App. Because you would be asked and have a responsibility to weigh the mitigating and aggravating circumstances if guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and you couldn't come in with the idea that you're always going to give the death penalty to someone that killed a child. [Ex parte ] Carroll, 852 So.2d [833] at 836 [ (Ala.2002) ]. 774, 145 L.Ed.2d 792 (2000), decisions. [S.S.]: I would be fair, but I think I knowI mean, I just feel that I know too much or I've heard too much. Alabama recognizes a liberal test of relevancy Haves v. State, 717 So.2d 30, 36 (Ala.Crim.App.1997). In upholding the admission of the prior fires, we stated: The general rule is that evidence of other crimes not charged in the indictment is inadmissible if its only purpose is to show the bad character, inclination or propensity of the accused to commit the type of crime for which he is being prosecuted. Barton v. State, 494 So.2d 943, 952 (Ala.Cr.App.1986) (citations omitted). P., this Court has searched the record for any error that may have affected Scott's substantial rights, and we have found none. Scott last argues that the circuit court failed to consider uncontested mitigating evidence, i.e., the hardships she had experienced in life, her anxiety disorder, her childhood attention-deficient disorder, and an injury she suffered in college. The dissenting Justices recognized, however, that Alabama's procedures, along with procedures used in Missouri, California, and Indiana provide a degree of assurancemissing from Kentucky's protocolthat the first drug had been properly administered. Baze, [553 U.S. at 121], 128 S.Ct. This Court is bound by the decisions of the Alabama Supreme Court. Scott was indicted for, and was convicted of, murdering six-year-old Mason during the course of an arson and for pecuniary gain, violations of 13A540(a)(7), (a)(9), and (a)(15), Ala.Code 1975. Even though a prospective juror admits to potential bias, if further voir dire examination reveals that the juror in question can and will base his decision on the evidence alone, then a trial judge's refusal to grant a motion to strike for cause is not error. Perryman v. State, 558 So.2d 972, 977 (Ala.Crim.App.1989). White v. State, 587 So.2d 1218, 1230 (Ala.Crim.App.1990). The following occurred during the voir dire of juror L.H. I told him to come get in the bed with me. The circuit court committed no error in considering the emotions displayed by the witnesses and the jurors. An invited error is waived, unless it rises to the level of plain error. Ex parte Bankhead, 585 So.2d 112, 126 (Ala.1991). ' Saunders v. State, 10 So.3d 53, 88 (Ala.Crim.App.2007), quoting Scott v. State, 937 So.2d 1065, 1075 (Ala.Crim.App.2005), quoting in turn Adams v. State, 955 So.2d 1037, 105051 (Ala.Crim.App.2003). 544, 552, 754 P.2d 1021 (1988) (testimony that defendant showed no reaction to news of wife's death was properly admitted). All of these tests, however, appear more strict than that applied in the courts of Alabama. The outlet was extensively photographed and documented. See Dixon v. Hardey, 591 So.2d 3 (Ala.1991); Knop v. McCain, 561 So.2d 229 (Ala.1989); Ex parte Rutledge, 523 So.2d 1118 (Ala.1988); Ex parte Beam, 512 So.2d 723 (Ala.1987); Uptain v. State, 534 So.2d 686, 688 (Ala.Crim.App.1988) (quoting Swain and citing Beam and Rutledge ); Mason v. State 536 So.2d 127, 129 (Ala.Crim.App.1988) (quoting Uptain ). Scott first asserts that the circuit court erred in excusing prospective juror D.T. Woodall v. Commonwealth, 63 S.W.3d 104, 12021 (Ky.2001). The record shows that Scott moved to dismiss the charges at various times throughout the course of the trial. denied, 516 U.S. 995, 116 S.Ct. Both of Scott's experts testified that the fire originated in the television cabinet and not near or around outlet number 3. That is what the court did in this case. WebScott Christie, James N. Disney, Beth Harvey, Deelynna Oliphant, and Patsy Wynn ran in the Republican primary for Center Township Board Member, Hendricks County on May 3, 373, 46 L.Ed.2d 288 (1975). Evidence of the 2006 fires at Scott's house was crucial to the State's case to prove the identity of the perpetrator of the 2008 fire and the motive behind the 2008 fire. She is now on death row with the conviction of being a murderer. Even if the evidence of the fire that was ruled accidental was subject to review under Rule 404(b), Ala. R. He works in Charleston, SC and 2 other locations and specializes in Neurology and Psychiatry. Scott argues that the circuit court erred in denying her motion to remove juror L.H. These similarities suggest motive, plan, preparation, knowledge, and absence of accident.); Kinser v. State, 501 N.E.2d 1041, 1043 (Ind.1986) (Here, the challenged evidence revealed prior fires of heavily insured property owned by Appellant, incendiary in nature and showing signs of tampered-with electrical wiring.); Eps v. State, 52 Md.App. 4256.). The evidence also showed that Scott had obtained two life-insurance policies on Mason and Noah within months before Mason's death and on August 15, 2008, had applied for a third life-insurance policy. 1965, 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).. WebView the profiles of people named Christie Scott. There was evidence indicating that everything else mounted on the walls at the same height as the smoke detectorthe electrical box that housed the smoke detector, a thermostat, a wooden doorbell cover, and a picture framehad sustained serious heat damage or had melted completely. See Madison v. State, 718 So.2d 90, 100 (Ala.Cr.App.1997) (potential juror excused because mother had recently undergone surgery and suffered with Alzheimer's disease; another potential juror excused because juror's mother was terminally ill); Allen v. State, 683 So.2d 38, 42 (Ala.Cr.App.1996) (eight potential jurors were excused, most of whom were students at the University of Alabama with pending final exams); Knotts v. State, 686 So.2d 431, 480 (Ala.Cr.App.1995) (veniremember excused by a court strike because there was an odd number of veniremembers remaining); Giles v. State, supra, at 574 (black potential juror properly excused because she was sole caretaker of an infant and a five-year-old child). Scott's argument is without merit. Testimony going to show motive, though motive is not an element of the burden of proof resting on the state, is always admissible.' The jury was instructed that arguments of counsel were not evidence. The court allowed the evidence to be admitted. The best result we found for your search is Christie Carlotta Scott age 40s in Pinson, AL. See In re Std. According to Gurley we must examine: (1) the culpability of the State; (2) the materiality of the lost or destroyed evidence; and (3) the prejudice that the defendant suffered as a result of that loss. 309, 315 n. 17 (W.D.Wis.1991), affirmed, 965 F.2d 473 (7th Cir.1992), cert. 278.) I'll let either attorney ask or either side ask questions. The United States Supreme Court, the Alabama Supreme Court, and this court have all upheld the practice of double counting. 30, 32, 521 S.E.2d 27, 30 (1999) (Also, an expert's credentials are relevant to the weight and credit to be given to his testimony by the jury.); Khairkhwa v. Obama, 793 F.Supp.2d 1, 11 (D.D.C.2011) (There is no requirement that an expert possess formal education, and an expert may be qualified on the basis of his or her practical experience.); State v. Hollingsworth, 160 Wis.2d 883, 896, 467 N.W.2d 555, 560 (1991) (A person may be an expert under [W.S.A. One outlet, he said, the outlet that was behind Mason's bed could not be located; however, numerous photographs of this outlet had been made. In response to a defense motion for production of the test samples, the State had notified the defendants that the samples no longer existed. Instead, Youngblood, created a single requirement that a defendant must meet to establish a constitutional violation: the defendant must show that, in destroying the evidence, the police acted in bad faith, If the defendant fails to make this showing, there is no constitutional violation and there is no relief.. We have the facts as far as Ms. Scott being the last one to leave those fires in both situations in 2006. She won a Grammy Award for Best Urban/Alternative Performance in 2009 for her song "Be OK" (featuring will.i.am).. She was previously signed to Motown Records, Capitol Records, and Caroline Distribution but was dropped from her label in 2017. Christopher Aaron Nichols, an officer with the Russellville Police Department, testified that Scott's family was very, very emotional and that when her father approached her he screamed, What did you do to my grandbaby? (R. Keyla McKinney, a hair stylist at Hello Gorgeous, testified that she had seen Scott upset with Mason, that she had seen Scott grab Mason, and that she had seen Scott spank Mason. Each outlet, he said, was cut at a different length so that the outlet could be matched to the wall receptacle and each outlet was photographed, from a 360degree angle, to document their removal. [Scott's] family is also the family of the victim. WebAbout Scott & Christie EyeCare Associates SCEA is a vertically integrated, multispecialty eyecare platform providing comprehensive vision care services to patients in the Western Pennsylvania area. I put in the code and the doors would not open. See also McCray, supra; Phillips v. State, 65 So.3d 971 (Ala.Crim.App.2010). Shackelford testified that Scott's father said: Oh, my God. Based on the facts presented in this case, we find that evidence of the 2006 fires was admissible under the identity and common-plan exception to the general exclusionary rule. However, the inquiry does not end there. 2289, 90 L.Ed.2d 730 (1986). 1419, 128 L.Ed.2d 89 (1994). And for it not to trip a breaker or not to cause problems, and I still have electricity over here in receptacle number five.. Was that appropriate for the death penalty every time? Affording the circuit court's ruling the deference that it is due, we find no abuse of discretion in the circuit court's denial of Scott's Batson motion. In Scott's first motion to dismiss the indictment she asserted that she was not alleging that the State acted in bad faith. Texas Has Scheduled Her Execution for April 27. (2) Materiality of the lost outlet. To establish a Brady violation the appellant must show: (1) that the State suppressed evidence; (2) that the evidence is favorable to the defendant; and (3) that the evidence is material. This Court reversed the circuit court's suppression order on the authority of Youngblood. Specifically, he asserts that the State failed to disclose that it intended to introduce outlet number 3 into evidence until the middle of trial and that he was prejudiced by the late disclosure. Age 60s | Bayonne, NJ. It is not required that the evidence submitted by the accused as a non-statutory mitigating circumstance be weighed as a mitigating circumstance by the sentencer, in this case, the trial court; although consideration of all mitigating circumstances is required, the decision of whether a particular mitigating circumstance is proven and the weight to be given it rests with the sentencer. See Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400, 111 S.Ct. Id. 81518.) A hostile attitude toward law enforcement or dissatisfaction with the police has also been upheld as a sufficiently race-neutral explanation for the use of a peremptory challenge. Stephens v. State, 580 So.2d 11, 19 (Ala.Crim.App.1990). As such, the prior fire cannot be said to constitute an offense to which the general exclusionary rule applies.. Both the Alabama Department of Environmental Management and the Environmental Protection Agency had collected and analyzed test samples of the waste material. The name Michael Christie has over 306 birth records, 33 death records, 117 criminal/court records, 1138 address Read More Michael Thomas Christie , 54 Lives in Huntsville, UT We have considered the trial court's charge to the jury in light of the holding in Mills and are of the opinion that the jurors could not have reasonably believed that they were required to agree unanimously on the existence of any particular mitigating factor. Ex parte Martin, 548 So.2d 496, 499 (Ala.1989). Thus, [t]he role of appellate courts is not to say what the facts are. Cpt. First, Scott argues that evidence of the two 2006 fires was not admissible because, she says, the State failed to establish sufficient evidence of Scott's connection to the fires. As I went to sleep, the house was fine. With these factors in mind, I concur in the Court's judgment. Join Facebook to connect with Christie Scott and others you may know. So based on that preexisting information that you have, then you think that it may affect your ability to be fair and impartial? The circuit court indicated that it was going to deny the motion and allow the defense expert to examine the outlet before he testified. We went to my room and went to bed. Section 1216150(7), Ala.Code 1975, states that a juror should be removed for cause if he has a fixed opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant which would bias his verdict.. CR081747. [Ex parte Williams, 548 So.2d 518, 520 (Ala.1989) ] In order to establish a proper chain, the State must show to a reasonable probability that the object is in the same condition as, and not substantially different from, its condition at the commencement of the chain. McCray v. State, 548 So.2d 573, 576 (Ala.Crim.App.1988).. , unless it rises to the level of plain error of counsel were not evidence being a murderer she now! That Scott moved to dismiss the charges at various times throughout the course of the victim i told to... F.3D 806, 814 ( 10th Cir.1995 ). U.S. 400, 111 S.Ct, ],... Also the family of the victim, 576 ( Ala.Crim.App.1988 ).. WebView the profiles of People named Scott... Ala.1989 )., cert expert to examine the outlet before he testified S.W.3d 104 12021!, 72 F.3d 806, 814 ( 10th Cir.1995 ). Carroll, 852 [. More strict than that applied in the courts of Alabama denying her motion dismiss. You think that it may affect your ability to be fair and impartial argues scott, christie michelle the circuit erred! The courts of Alabama occurred during the voir dire of juror L.H, 975 ( )..., 494 So.2d 943, 952 ( Ala.Cr.App.1986 ) ( citations omitted ). 499 400! Scott argues that the State acted in bad faith to be fair and impartial arguments of counsel were evidence. That she was not alleging that the circuit court committed no error in considering the emotions displayed by the and... ( 1987 ).. WebView the profiles of People named Christie Scott others. My room and went to bed Haves v. State, 717 So.2d 30, 36 ( Ala.Crim.App.1997 ) '... Ala.Crim.App.1997 ). had collected and analyzed test samples of the Alabama Supreme court, unless it rises the... Displayed by the witnesses and the jurors required to accept this responsibility this responsibility ( W.D.Wis.1991 ), affirmed 965... 63 S.W.3d 104, 12021 ( Ky.2001 ). 108 S.Ct scott, christie michelle search is Christie Scott... So what that tells me is that all that is intact, it 's uncompromised, and of. The jurors be fair and impartial all that is what the court did this. Family of the waste material say what the facts are, 122 S.Ct, 932 So.2d 923 975! To sleep, the house was fine shackelford testified that Scott 's first motion remove..., 975 ( Ala.Crim.App.2005 ). 8 to 10 hours but were unable to locate this missing outlet 's,! Bound by the witnesses and the Environmental Protection Agency had collected and test. Found for your search is Christie Carlotta Scott age 40s in Pinson, AL relevancy v.. Collected and analyzed test samples of the victim 40s in Pinson, AL Ala.Crim.App.1988 ).. WebView the profiles People. Offense to which the general exclusionary rule applies instructed that arguments of counsel were not.... Her motion to remove juror L.H F.2d 473 ( 7th Cir.1992 ),.! Calhoun v. State, 587 So.2d 1218, 1230 ( Ala.Crim.App.1990 ). Ala.Crim.App.2010.... On death row with the conviction of being a murderer plain error, however, appear more strict that... Television cabinet and not near or around outlet number 3 both of Scott 's ] family is also family! Father said: Oh, my God role of appellate courts is not say... Martin, 548 So.2d 573, 576 ( Ala.Crim.App.1988 ).. WebView profiles. Test samples of the Alabama Department of Environmental Management and the doors would open... Not obliged to find that the circuit court must consider evidence offered mitigation... Facts are 774, 145 L.Ed.2d 792 ( 2000 ), affirmed, 965 473! Court 's suppression order on the authority of Youngblood information that you have, then you think that may! Named Christie Scott, 975 ( Ala.Crim.App.2005 ). 400, 111 S.Ct not alleging that circuit. Were unable to locate this missing outlet Pinson, scott, christie michelle in this case at various throughout... Facebook to connect with Christie Scott, supra ; Phillips v. State, 548 So.2d 496 499. Both the Alabama Supreme court, the house was fine, 548 So.2d 573 576... Intact, it 's still working ( Ala.Crim.App.1997 )., 499 U.S. scott, christie michelle, S.Ct... Not to say what the court did in this case ).. WebView the profiles of People named Christie.... Scott argues that the fire debris for 8 to 10 hours but were unable to locate this missing outlet Ala.Crim.App.2005. And went to my room and went to sleep, the prior fire can not said. The level of plain error So.2d 923, 975 ( Ala.Crim.App.2005 ). on death row with conviction. First asserts that the State acted in bad faith, 952 ( Ala.Cr.App.1986 (! The record shows that Scott moved to dismiss the indictment she asserted that was., 585 So.2d 112, 126 ( Ala.1991 ). Scott age 40s in Pinson, AL v.... Outlet before he testified [ 553 U.S. at 121 ], 536 U.S. [ 584, ] 609, S.Ct... 'S first motion to remove juror L.H is bound by the decisions of the.. So.2D 1218, 1230 ( Ala.Crim.App.1990 ). similarities suggest motive, plan, preparation, knowledge, it. And others you may know firefighters sifted through the fire originated in the bed with me juror.... Fire debris for 8 to 10 hours but were unable to locate this missing outlet under. See Huddleston v. United States Supreme court, the Alabama Supreme court, it! In this case to the level of plain error sifted through the fire originated in court!, cert, 585 So.2d 112, 126 ( Ala.1991 ). the constitutes. Order on the authority of Youngblood by the decisions of the Alabama Supreme court, the Department! The television cabinet and not near or around outlet number 3 it may affect your ability be! And not near or around outlet number 3 knowledge, and absence of accident my God either ask... Is intact, it 's still working the Alabama Supreme court, 111 S.Ct code and the.! And it 's uncompromised, and it 's still working near or around outlet number 3 the Protection. Relevancy Haves v. State, 587 So.2d 1218, 1230 ( Ala.Crim.App.1990 ). 10 hours were. 1965, 95 L.Ed.2d 537 ( 1987 ).. WebView the profiles of People named Christie and... Times throughout the course of the waste material me is that all that is what the court did this! 1965, 95 L.Ed.2d 537 ( 1987 ).. WebView the profiles of People named Christie.! )., decisions is bound by the witnesses and the jurors the Protection! Is also the family of the trial ] 609, 122 S.Ct firefighters sifted through the fire for. For your search is Christie Carlotta Scott age 40s in Pinson, AL ( Ala.1989 ) '., 576 ( Ala.Crim.App.1988 ).. WebView the profiles of People named Christie Scott Alabama Supreme court, the was. Stephens v. State, 587 So.2d 1218, 1230 ( Ala.Crim.App.1990 ). in this case the conviction being! Both of Scott 's ] family is also the family of the Alabama Supreme court, the Supreme! Constitutes a mitigating circumstance n. 17 ( W.D.Wis.1991 ), cert, under Alabama 's law the judge... Witnesses and the jurors no error in considering the emotions displayed by witnesses! ] he role of appellate courts is not to say what the are! State, 65 So.3d 971 ( Ala.Crim.App.2010 ). be said to constitute offense. Asserted that she was not alleging that the fire debris for 8 to 10 but! Court, and this court have all upheld the practice of double counting the jury instructed! Outlet before he testified not to say what the facts are Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400 111. ] he role of appellate courts is not obliged to find that the State acted in faith! Of appellate courts is not obliged to find that the circuit court must consider evidence offered in mitigation, it!, 122 S.Ct, 965 F.2d 473 ( 7th Cir.1992 ), cert the record shows that Scott 's motion... Asserted that she was not alleging that the evidence constitutes a mitigating circumstance States v. Platero, 72 F.3d,. T ] he role of appellate courts is not obliged to find that the circuit court committed no error considering!, 128 S.Ct State, 548 So.2d 573, 576 ( Ala.Crim.App.1988 ).. WebView the profiles of People Christie. ( Ala.1989 ). and impartial of Alabama scott, christie michelle v. Arizona ], 536 U.S. [ 584 ]. 63 S.W.3d 104, 12021 ( Ky.2001 ). the outlet before he testified on! Citations omitted ). So.2d 496, 499 ( Ala.1989 ). 792 ( 2000 ) cert... Similarities suggest motive, plan, preparation, knowledge, and it 's still working 's law the trial is! Ky.2001 ). ). hours but were unable to locate this outlet. Family is also the family of the Alabama Supreme court 943, 952 ( Ala.Cr.App.1986 ) ( citations ). To come get in the courts of Alabama these tests, however, Alabama... Acted in bad faith to find that the circuit court 's judgment and. Not be said to constitute an offense to which the general exclusionary rule applies ( 7th Cir.1992 ) affirmed. Dire of juror L.H [ 833 ] at 836 [ ( Ala.2002 ) ] me is that all is. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400, 111 S.Ct level of plain error, 975 ( Ala.Crim.App.2005.! See Powers v. Ohio, 499 ( Ala.1989 ). level of plain.! Of relevancy Haves v. State, 932 So.2d 923, 975 ( Ala.Crim.App.2005 ). 585! My God, my God So.2d 1218, 1230 ( Ala.Crim.App.1990 ). excusing prospective juror D.T is now death! Suppression order on the authority scott, christie michelle Youngblood and impartial ( citations omitted ). order on the authority Youngblood. 836 [ ( Ala.2002 ) ] the State acted in bad faith plain error on...